Driving to work this morning, listening to Dave’s Morning Show, he played Kenny Loggin’s theme song from the movie, “Caddyshack” “I’m All Right“.
A portion of the lyrics harmonized with me (or was it me, harmonizing with the radio – doubtful):
I’m alright
Don’t nobody worry ’bout me
You got to gimme a fight
Why don’t you just let me beWho do you want
Who you be today
And who is it really
Makin’ up your mind
The lyrics were more in support of the movie’s plot – a teenager trying to be a teenager, or trying to prepare himself for adulthood. Classic, coming-of-age movie. {“The most important decision you can make right now is what do you stand for, Danny? Goodness… or badness?”}
Thinking of goodness and badness (this is after the song ended, of course, but not before I had stopped speeding ahem, driving safely with my co-commuters), It occurred to me that since the beginning of this current presidential campaign last year, I have not come across any psychopathically deranged staunch supporter of the major candidates. This includes the primary failures contestants. In person. Any person. Everyone I’ve spoken with, only casually, because it seems no one can get more than two sentences into discussing the topic without ending in a quick shrug and saying, “we’re screwed”.
The only satisfaction we can get is by singing the refrain from Steve Miller Band’s, “Stuck In the Middle with You”.
Clowns to the left of me,
Joker’s to the right,
Here I am Stuck in the middle with you
Halfway through, and I haven’t even explained the title. Originally, I titled this ‘Placebo Election’, but on double-checking my terminology I found my title was actually pronouncing a positive outcome on the forthcoming sheeple-herding. Ninety-eight days {shudder} to go. For many people, they believe wholeheartedly, that their vote will matter. Even with the present exposés proving, and being admitted by some of the perpetrators, that the carny game is rigged. According to the link above, thirty-two percent of people believe in the placebo effect. One-third of the electorate. They even quote the Talmud, “Where there is hope, there is life.” To paraphrase, ‘Where there is hope, there is decent, responsible government”. (Ooh. I just burped up some breakfast. Damn jalapeños.)
Catching myself, I quickly investigated what the opposite term is. Nocebo. Logical, but jeez, it sounds lame. A nocebo is different than negative reinforcement; the first thing I thought of as a related idea. Where using a nocebo suggests taking something or action may cause a negative effect, negative reinforcement involves the removal of the aversive stimulus (as shown in the link). Thus, we have a nocebo election. We’re about to take an action – voting – that may cause a negative effect. Given the mass produced (allowed) choices, I suggest that the use of may is erroneous.
I’ve been aware for some time of the difference between the myth and reality of ‘anyone can become President of the United States’. I suppose there isn’t any myth – it’s just the process of getting there is complicated, involving money and connections. It is true that anyone can apply to be a candidate, if they meet some basic rules (shown at the link). Reading the list can be entertaining. But even the basic rules stated can be fudged. Receive or spend $5,000 on your candidacy? Sure. Let me set up my website and bill myself $5,000 for services rendered. That explains the really stupid names. Then there’s others that apply, just for the ‘bragging rights’ of saying “oh yeah, I was a formal candidate in that election”. Something that’ll show up in their obituary, probably.
Other posts I’ve made have harped the same theme. Elections don’t really matter. Historically, we really are no different than the last of the cave dwellers. From the earliest origins of organized civilization, some form of force has supported ‘leaders’. The baddest caveman was bested by a group of them; the group bested by bigger group(s); intelligent groups best stronger; connected groups best intelligence. All the time, the acquisition of property / money supports influence. Present day status encompasses all of these facets. Military, economy, society; the Great Game (Britishism), the Long Game (Chinese); no matter how you spin it, the individual is surpassed by the group.
A Nocebo Election, like the Kobayashi Maru, is – by design – a no-win scenario. Unless you change the rules.

Creepy similarity, isn’t it?

4 responses
There, you’ve inspired this: https://drkottaway.com/2016/08/24/diagnosis-is-only-half-the-job/
I keep thinking that this election is about world views in conflict.
LikeLike
Re placebos, I am searching for an article about a patient who needed chemotherapy but had poor kidney function. The physicians paired the chemo with a noxious tasting substance and gave a full dose on the first round. After that, the dose of the chemo was decreased but the noxious tasting substance remained the same. The patient had a full response to the chemo even though the dose was lowered. The patient knew that the dose was being changed.
In clinic I have two jobs: one is to decide what I think is going on with a patient and how I can help them as an MD. The second is to try to understand the patient’s world view well enough that I can communicate what I am concerned about and what therapy I recommend. If I do not do the second job, then therapy will not work, because the patient may dismiss what I say and may refuse the treatment. If I am respectful of their belief, no matter what it is, then I have a chance at negotiating treatment. The goal is to help the patient, right? Perhaps the placebo effect is more about trust and hope and respect than about positive thinking.
I will attach the article when I find it.
LikeLike
I think I’ve reached the point where I have realized that my vote means absolutely nothing. All of the electoral votes in my state (all of them) will go to the candidate who gets the most votes. And even then, the election will be decided by only a select few swing states anyway. Add to this the number of electoral votes who don’t even have to vote with the constituents in their state and it all becomes a pointless exercise.
Why would I want to go stand in line for hours before work to do a task that is meaningless anyway?
LikeLike
While it is mostly meaningless, it is not – entirely. This link (https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/76/PartyVotes-Presidents.png)
is interesting for how this shenanigans continues. The original intent has been superseded by technology. The rules have to be changed soon. The design of government has to be changed. Why have 535 floating turds in D.C. when states can send their governor (each state has its own State Senate; the Lt. Governor can lead the local issues, the Governor handles national issues). No empire has survived history without change; the US is no different.
LikeLike